Bfm old fashion design?

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Message
Author
osse
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:42 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Bfm old fashion design?

#16 Post by osse »

biggerrigger wrote:And to top it off it looks like the 117db rating is at 95hz or so. I would rather have the 105db at 25hz from the T60's and the giant pile of cash that's left over to put in the mouth of the T60's to see how far I could shoot it across the room :chainsaw:
105? it's 97.5 with one dual loaded 12" according to sensitivity charts, +6 two cabs... but the DSL thumper is about the same packspace as one t60 as far as I can see. But really, I must hear them compared to each other to be able to make a valid comparision... it's really up to first hand real world experience. as much as I love my t30's I don't hesitate about the performance of the t60

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28968
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Bfm old fashion design?

#17 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Charles Warwick wrote: It's really sad that a name like Danley has to make designs to meet rider specifications rather than what they may have been optimal.
Sad, but true. Danley was one of the first to prove that big drivers aren't needed for big sound with the LAB sub. But guys who write riders aren't engineers.

osse
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:42 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Bfm old fashion design?

#18 Post by osse »

Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:
Charles Warwick wrote: It's really sad that a name like Danley has to make designs to meet rider specifications rather than what they may have been optimal.
Sad, but true. Danley was one of the first to prove that big drivers aren't needed for big sound with the LAB sub. But guys who write riders aren't engineers.
I have never heard a Danley design in person, but they look really promising indeed... The TH115 and the TH118 uses the same cabinet, can you expect the TH115 to have better SPL/SQ/extension?

Post Reply