BFM vs Funktion one?

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Post Reply
Message
Author
osse
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:42 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

BFM vs Funktion one?

#1 Post by osse »

Hey, I've heard a lot of good setups with those cabs, and I wonder how Bills designs compare to them? anyone who have good experience with both systems who are willing to share their opinion?

Thanks
Ossian

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28916
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#2 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

F1 doesn't make line arrayable tops so there's no basis for comparison.

osse
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:42 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#3 Post by osse »

But what about the subs? And in club environment fullrange 2 way systems where line arraying isn't neccessary?

User avatar
netwerks
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: Chicago, Ilinois
Contact:

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#4 Post by netwerks »

osse wrote:But what about the subs? And in club environment fullrange 2 way systems where line arraying isn't neccessary?
Line array may not be deemed as "necessary" by some but in fact will provide a superior audio experience in applications where it's traditionally not considered for use in most.

There are so many comparison points:

Application
Performance
Size
Weight
Total Cost of Ownership (outboard gear, DSP, amps etc)
etc.

I think there's enough data on this site that one would have to start with the specific application and work their way down the list of variable comparison points to formulate a data-based comparison.

osse
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:42 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#5 Post by osse »

netwerks wrote:
osse wrote:But what about the subs? And in club environment fullrange 2 way systems where line arraying isn't neccessary?
Line array may not be deemed as "necessary" by some but in fact will provide a superior audio experience in applications where it's traditionally not considered for use in most.

There are so many comparison points:

Application
Performance
Size
Weight
Total Cost of Ownership (outboard gear, DSP, amps etc)
etc.

I think there's enough data on this site that one would have to start with the specific application and work their way down the list of variable comparison points to formulate a data-based comparison.
To me a complete systems quality is a combination of performance, size and weight in its intend environment(application), which I've described as club environment.

Price set aside, which I guess would be no comparision

User avatar
jcmbowman
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:40 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#6 Post by jcmbowman »

osse wrote:Hey, I've heard a lot of good setups with those cabs, and I wonder how Bills designs compare to them? anyone who have good experience with both systems who are willing to share their opinion?

Thanks
Ossian
There's no comparison - it's like comparing a Lamborghini to a home-garage built rally car. Yes, they both go fast, have 4 wheels, and use an internal combustion engine, but it's a totally different league.


If you have money to burn and want a brand-name speaker system that you can use to promote your event/venue as having top-notch sound (even if it isn't really top-notch), then go ahead and waste your cash on Funktion One.

If you're not independently wealthy, and the way things sound is more important than the way they look (or the name brand recognition) and you're willing to take the time to build it right, go with BFM.



I'll put my BFM system up against a comparably-sized Funktion One system any time. I've done 2nd room sound where the main room was Funktion One, and that system beat me on volume, because it was easily 3 times the size, but everyone commented on how much cleaner, and deeper, my system was. (Of course, it could have been the fact that I was mostly sober, and the guys running sound in the other room were coked out of their gourds....) I also noticed that because of the line array vs. clustered point source technologies, I had much more even coverage from my system.
Low End Junkie for over 20 years.

4 DR250s
4 Tuba36s @ 30" wide
2 ATs
...and a very serious addiction to the smell of BB sawdust and curing PL.

User avatar
netwerks
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: Chicago, Ilinois
Contact:

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#7 Post by netwerks »

jcmbowman wrote:
osse wrote:Hey, I've heard a lot of good setups with those cabs, and I wonder how Bills designs compare to them? anyone who have good experience with both systems who are willing to share their opinion?

Thanks
Ossian
There's no comparison - it's like comparing a Lamborghini to a home-garage built rally car. Yes, they both go fast, have 4 wheels, and use an internal combustion engine, but it's a totally different league.


If you have money to burn and want a brand-name speaker system that you can use to promote your event/venue as having top-notch sound (even if it isn't really top-notch), then go ahead and waste your cash on Funktion One.

If you're not independently wealthy, and the way things sound is more important than the way they look (or the name brand recognition) and you're willing to take the time to build it right, go with BFM.



I'll put my BFM system up against a comparably-sized Funktion One system any time. I've done 2nd room sound where the main room was Funktion One, and that system beat me on volume, because it was easily 3 times the size, but everyone commented on how much cleaner, and deeper, my system was. (Of course, it could have been the fact that I was mostly sober, and the guys running sound in the other room were coked out of their gourds....) I also noticed that because of the line array vs. clustered point source technologies, I had much more even coverage from my system.
+1

User avatar
lazyman
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:37 am
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#8 Post by lazyman »

Some tome ago i have listened this F1 system:

Image

This was R1 in some kind of "line array" on factory provided brackets for 3 R1 boxes per side.

I was seriously disappointing by uneven coverage of the system. This is one of worst systems i have ever listened. High frequencies response is different on every square meter. Drastically different sound even if you move only 1m to left or right or front.

If other F1 systems are like that, F1 is seriously over-hyped. Bills Otop12s has drastically better coverage. Seems that F1 puts all cash in marketing, not engineering.
Omnitop 12 (Kappa12 - melded piezo) - 2
Titan39 (B&C 12BG100) - 1

https://www.facebook.com/djserviskula?fref=ts

DrDantastic
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:39 pm
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent, UK

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#9 Post by DrDantastic »

It seems they've cannibalised the flying bracket there. I don't think F1 do any kind of horizontal flying system, or at least I didn't see one while I was working in their workshop! A properly arrayed and setup F1 system can sound fantastic and rate among some of my favourites but unfortunately I'm yet to hear a full BFM system so I can't really provide a valid argument. I just thought I would chip in about the bracket :P

User avatar
lazyman
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:37 am
Location: Serbia
Contact:

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#10 Post by lazyman »

Bracket image can be found on funktion-one website, under Products>R1>In Action, first image in row.
Omnitop 12 (Kappa12 - melded piezo) - 2
Titan39 (B&C 12BG100) - 1

https://www.facebook.com/djserviskula?fref=ts

DrDantastic
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:39 pm
Location: Tunbridge Wells, Kent, UK

Re: BFM vs Funktion one?

#11 Post by DrDantastic »

Fair enough! I must say I've never played with the R1, only the R2, 4 and 5. It's a shame it sounded so bad, especially when you compare it to what they had at Glastonbury this year. That was with a new box for the high-mid and it sounded fantastic!

Post Reply