phase vs time alignment
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
phase vs time alignment
I am having trouble wrapping my mind around the difference. If I precisely time align my cabs are they in phase? Is there a DSP that can put everything in phase?
2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
- Dave Non-Zero
- Posts: 1939
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:59 am
- Location: Dundee, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: phase vs time alignment
I'm looking forward to a good answer to this. 

-1 for thought terminating cliches.
Built and/or own:
8 x T48 24" 3015LF
6 x DR280
2 x DR250 old style beta10
2 x T36s 20" delta15L
1 x TAT
1 x dual Lab12 30" T60
In Progress:
2 x DR280
Built and/or own:
8 x T48 24" 3015LF
6 x DR280
2 x DR250 old style beta10
2 x T36s 20" delta15L
1 x TAT
1 x dual Lab12 30" T60
In Progress:
2 x DR280
Re: phase vs time alignment
+1Dave Non-Zero wrote:I'm looking forward to a good answer to this.
Built: 2 T48 24" 3015LF, 2 DR250 2510
Planned: 4 T48 18" 3015LF, 4 DR250 2510
Planned: 4 T48 18" 3015LF, 4 DR250 2510
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
Re: phase vs time alignment
Dang. I thought you may have it with your cab spiel in the Titan/Tuba section.Dave Non-Zero wrote:I'm looking forward to a good answer to this.

2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 28916
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: phase vs time alignment
Where time align is concerned you can only precisely time align on one dispersion plane. And even on that plane the differing phase responses of the different speakers/drivers make perfection impossible. So the answer is to keep things as close as is practical, because if you're trying to get it perfect it's a fruitless quest.
- BrentEvans
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
- Location: Salisbury, NC
Re: phase vs time alignment
Phase and time alignment are related. Time aligning everything does not necessarily put everything "In phase," because phase is relative. It does correct phase error due to physical delay, but not due to cab design.
Read my response in this thread. It might help clarify, particularly one of my line drawings. While the drawing is designed to represent degrees of phase, imagine a speaker sitting to the left of the drawing. The effect of delay on phase is equivalent to moving the speaker back and forth, and thusly the wave moves (so to speak).
Read my response in this thread. It might help clarify, particularly one of my line drawings. While the drawing is designed to represent degrees of phase, imagine a speaker sitting to the left of the drawing. The effect of delay on phase is equivalent to moving the speaker back and forth, and thusly the wave moves (so to speak).
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
Re: phase vs time alignment
Those drawings is why I started this thread. I didn't want to hijack the other one.
Also I am still not comprehending how a Titan and Tuba can't play nice together. Given:
This is from another thread I started since feedback (under mixers/processor-feedback) has/is always a nightmare for me. So I was wondering how you fix/avoid the phase issues?Ron K wrote:Well here's the bottom line. With the PA at war volume you should be able use an open mic within 3 ft of either stack and clearly understand it.If not either you EQ set up is drastically wrong or you are using a pretty crappy mic or both.Keep in mind systems that are not time aligned very well are more problematic with feedback.Especially those where their are phasing problems and the operator is trying to correct the timing error with amplitude correction.
Also I am still not comprehending how a Titan and Tuba can't play nice together. Given:
Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:Where time align is concerned you can only precisely time align on one dispersion plane. And even on that plane the differing phase responses of the different speakers/drivers make perfection impossible. So the answer is to keep things as close as is practical, because if you're trying to get it perfect it's a fruitless quest.
2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
- BrentEvans
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
- Location: Salisbury, NC
Re: phase vs time alignment
OK... let's see if this makes any more sense. Even if you time align the cabs to eliminate the phase errors that occur due to differences is travel, you cannot eliminate the differences in phase that occur because of cab response. EQing each cab separately can help this, as EQ affects phase just as much as amplitude. However, it isn't foolproof because it isn't perfect.
The vertical lines represent 180 degrees phase. Here are two representations of what the phase responses of two subs might look like:
Notice that there are a couple of spots where the cabs are 180 degrees out of phase from each other (vertical line on one cab intersects zero degrees on the other cab). Time alignment does not change this because it is based upon the nature of the cab. Having cabs that aren't time aligned involves a whole new set of phase issues... in addition to the ones that are there because of mixing cabs with different phase response.
The vertical lines represent 180 degrees phase. Here are two representations of what the phase responses of two subs might look like:
Notice that there are a couple of spots where the cabs are 180 degrees out of phase from each other (vertical line on one cab intersects zero degrees on the other cab). Time alignment does not change this because it is based upon the nature of the cab. Having cabs that aren't time aligned involves a whole new set of phase issues... in addition to the ones that are there because of mixing cabs with different phase response.
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 28916
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: phase vs time alignment
You're talking about two completely different issues. One is aligning two cabs/drivers in time so that they exhibit as close as possible to the same phase at the crossover point, specifically so that they're not in the vicinity of a cumulative 180 degrees apart. The other is using two cabs together within the same bandwidth, and as the phase response of both those cabs will differ at most frequencies across their pass bands you can't use time align to make them the same.subharmonic wrote:
Also I am still not comprehending how a Titan and Tuba can't play nice together. Given:Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:Where time align is concerned you can only precisely time align on one dispersion plane. And even on that plane the differing phase responses of the different speakers/drivers make perfection impossible. So the answer is to keep things as close as is practical, because if you're trying to get it perfect it's a fruitless quest.
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
Re: phase vs time alignment
Thanks Brent, that clarified it a lot for me. I am still a little confused on one thing in the last part of the last sentence.
Thanks Bill, you answered my next question while I was writing it.
So you are saying although most of the time completely unnecessary (since tubas cut though the whole range) you can get different cabs to play nicely together in different frequency ranges.
I really don't want to drag both types with me but am interested in the workings of this.
So how does this work with DR tops or any tops for that matter? Wouldn't the horn section vs HF section suffer phase issues?
Thanks Bill, you answered my next question while I was writing it.
So you are saying although most of the time completely unnecessary (since tubas cut though the whole range) you can get different cabs to play nicely together in different frequency ranges.
I really don't want to drag both types with me but am interested in the workings of this.
So how does this work with DR tops or any tops for that matter? Wouldn't the horn section vs HF section suffer phase issues?
2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 28916
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: phase vs time alignment
No. If they're close to 180 degrees apart you'll get a cancellation notch. That's easy to avoid via placement. If they're too far apart in time you'll hear them as two different sources in time, ie., a double-hit, and that's also easy to avoid by placing the crossover above 800Hz, where the period of the cycle is too short to hear the two sources independently. The last consideration is precedence effect, where the frequency first heard dominates. So long as the highs lead the lows that results in a subjectively brighter sound, which is pleasing to the ear. When the lows lead the sound seems dull. All of our tops have the highs either leading or aligned with the lows.subharmonic wrote:
So how does this work with DR tops or any tops for that matter? Wouldn't the horn section vs HF section suffer phase issues?
BBE, BTW, works by delaying the lows, resulting in the highs either being aligned with or leading. That's useful in typical woofer/horn PA cabs where the HF driver sits behind the woofer, not so in ours.
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
Re: phase vs time alignment
BBE? Are you referring to sonic maximizers?Bill Fitzmaurice wrote: BBE, BTW, works by delaying the lows, resulting in the highs either being aligned with or leading. That's useful in typical woofer/horn PA cabs where the HF driver sits behind the woofer, not so in ours.
2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 28916
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: phase vs time alignment
Yes.subharmonic wrote:BBE? Are you referring to sonic maximizers?Bill Fitzmaurice wrote: BBE, BTW, works by delaying the lows, resulting in the highs either being aligned with or leading. That's useful in typical woofer/horn PA cabs where the HF driver sits behind the woofer, not so in ours.
- subharmonic
- Posts: 2061
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:57 pm
- Location: Mandan ND
Re: phase vs time alignment
A DJ I was helping last weekend was using a BBE 882i maxed out on top and bottom, the feedback issues we were having was beyond obscene. There was no BFM cabs involved, no time correction, and I wasn't able to calibrate the room since the Maximizer was the only processing they had. I was able to bring in my Behringer 8024 as an afterthought put it in the wireless mic out before the mic in on the board. HPF 160hz, let the Behringer find the ringing frequencies and EQ them down 6-10db myself (didn't try full manual as we were short on time). This was my 1st attempt at semi-manual feedback correction. Didn't work and seemed to make things worse.
I suspected the Maximizer as part of the issue. Could the phase adjustments they do be part of the cause?
I suspected the Maximizer as part of the issue. Could the phase adjustments they do be part of the cause?
2x T39, 1x T60, 1x THTLP, 1x AT(not built by me) 6x DR250
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
I need more bass
But this gal's built like a burlap bag full of bobcats
CW Mcall
Re: phase vs time alignment
Wow...even before I sold mine I never went beyond 1 o clock.subharmonic wrote:A DJ I was helping last weekend was using a BBE 882i maxed out on top and bottom, the feedback issues we were having was beyond obscene. There was no BFM cabs involved, no time correction, and I wasn't able to calibrate the room since the Maximizer was the only processing they had. I was able to bring in my Behringer 8024 as an afterthought put it in the wireless mic out before the mic in on the board. HPF 160hz, let the Behringer find the ringing frequencies and EQ them down 6-10db myself (didn't try full manual as we were short on time). This was my 1st attempt at semi-manual feedback correction. Didn't work and seemed to make things worse.
I suspected the Maximizer as part of the issue. Could the phase adjustments they do be part of the cause?
Donny Collins
Built:
Two 18" Tuba 30's 3012 LF
Two 26" Tuba 30's Lab 12
Two OmniTop 12's DL 2512 (Melded Array)
Presonus Studio One DAW
Harrison Consoles MixBus 32C DAW
Built:
Two 18" Tuba 30's 3012 LF
Two 26" Tuba 30's Lab 12
Two OmniTop 12's DL 2512 (Melded Array)
Presonus Studio One DAW
Harrison Consoles MixBus 32C DAW