New BF system

Post your reviews and pictures here.
Message
Author
User avatar
Paul Norman
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:06 am
Location: IA.
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#16 Post by Paul Norman »

gdougherty wrote:I'll be a pair of OT12 shy of your setup when I'm done with my next 8 (only going to keep using 2 of my previous 4) but I'll only have 4 30" T48's. Starting to wonder if 6-8 T48 wouldn't be the better route to go. How easy do your T48's generally run in comparison to the tops?
12 tops and 8 subs seem to make a good combo. I have turned down the subs a little ( on the DBX Drive rack). But it depends on the mix and type of music. Last nite I did a smaller show for a 50's 60's band and ran 4 OT's on each side and one stack of 4 Titans plated. It work well, but that's not like mixing a metal band. I try to get all the info about the show as I can; how many people expected, area to be covered, and type of music and then determind how much gear to use. I have a 22'x8' trailer with all the gear in it and only use what I think it will take. I don't like the roadie part :( so I like to keep it simple.

User avatar
vlad335
Posts: 471
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Latrobe, PA

Re: New BF system

#17 Post by vlad335 »

Great system! Thanks for posting the pics Paul.

I have 6 Omni tops and 2 Titans and I think I would be better served with 4 subs. don't get me wrong, the Titan's sound great but I'm pushing them pretty hard. More Titan's on the pile would have an added benefit of lower response too I think.
Currently running:
Four Titan 48's, Six Omnitop 12's, Two Wedgehorn 10's, Omni12 2-10

Also Built: Omni15 Tallboy, Omni10.5.

'The hardest material on earth is the human skull'. How do we know this? Try pounding a new idea into one.

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:05 pm
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#18 Post by Tom »

Nice rig, Paul!
Build Log

-- Done, in use --
4 - Dr250/2510/Piezo
2 - OmniTop 12
2 - T48/3015LF (22 inches wide)
2 - T48/3015LF (25 inches wide)
4 - Melded array w8
? - Omni 10

gdougherty
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:13 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#19 Post by gdougherty »

Paul Norman wrote:
gdougherty wrote:I'll be a pair of OT12 shy of your setup when I'm done with my next 8 (only going to keep using 2 of my previous 4) but I'll only have 4 30" T48's. Starting to wonder if 6-8 T48 wouldn't be the better route to go. How easy do your T48's generally run in comparison to the tops?
12 tops and 8 subs seem to make a good combo. I have turned down the subs a little ( on the DBX Drive rack). But it depends on the mix and type of music. Last nite I did a smaller show for a 50's 60's band and ran 4 OT's on each side and one stack of 4 Titans plated. It work well, but that's not like mixing a metal band. I try to get all the info about the show as I can; how many people expected, area to be covered, and type of music and then determind how much gear to use. I have a 22'x8' trailer with all the gear in it and only use what I think it will take. I don't like the roadie part :( so I like to keep it simple.
Thanks for the input. I'm not usually mixing metal so the 8X4 setup should probably do well for me.

User avatar
James R
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Upstate NY

Re: New BF system

#20 Post by James R »

Paul Norman wrote:
gdougherty wrote:I'll be a pair of OT12 shy of your setup when I'm done with my next 8 (only going to keep using 2 of my previous 4) but I'll only have 4 30" T48's. Starting to wonder if 6-8 T48 wouldn't be the better route to go. How easy do your T48's generally run in comparison to the tops?
12 tops and 8 subs seem to make a good combo. I have turned down the subs a little ( on the DBX Drive rack). But it depends on the mix and type of music. Last nite I did a smaller show for a 50's 60's band and ran 4 OT's on each side and one stack of 4 Titans plated. It work well, but that's not like mixing a metal band. I try to get all the info about the show as I can; how many people expected, area to be covered, and type of music and then determind how much gear to use. I have a 22'x8' trailer with all the gear in it and only use what I think it will take. I don't like the roadie part :( so I like to keep it simple.

Paul,
I see you are using the DRPA I have that also, are you using any delay between the tops and subs also wondering where did you crossover at with the Titans.

Thanks,
Jim
" Everyone Has a Photographic Memory, Just Not Everyone Has Film In The Camera"


4 x T48 24.5" 3015LF
8 x 112 Otops


NEXT 2 x DR280's

User avatar
Paul Norman
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:06 am
Location: IA.
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#21 Post by Paul Norman »

Paul,
I see you are using the DRPA I have that also, are you using any delay between the tops and subs also wondering where did you crossover at with the Titans.

Thanks,
Jim
No delay. Subs go up to 100HZ, at 24db LR. The OT12's won't do to much below 100 HZ.

gdougherty
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:13 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#22 Post by gdougherty »

Paul Norman wrote:
Paul,
I see you are using the DRPA I have that also, are you using any delay between the tops and subs also wondering where did you crossover at with the Titans.

Thanks,
Jim
No delay. Subs go up to 100HZ, at 24db LR. The OT12's won't do to much below 100 HZ.
Should bump that up to 48db LR

User avatar
Dave Non-Zero
Posts: 1939
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:59 am
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#23 Post by Dave Non-Zero »

you dont hav the option of 48db slope on the DRPA. Another point in favour ofthe DCX...
-1 for thought terminating cliches.

Built and/or own:
8 x T48 24" 3015LF
6 x DR280
2 x DR250 old style beta10
2 x T36s 20" delta15L
1 x TAT
1 x dual Lab12 30" T60

In Progress:
2 x DR280

gdougherty
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:13 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#24 Post by gdougherty »

Dave Non-Zero wrote:you dont hav the option of 48db slope on the DRPA. Another point in favour ofthe DCX...
Either it's underpowered for what it should be able to do, or dbx decided to unnecessarily hamstring the poor thing to push users into the $300 higher price point.

User avatar
Dave Non-Zero
Posts: 1939
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:59 am
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#25 Post by Dave Non-Zero »

I think thats exactly what they are doing. Hence the lack of brickwall limiters too, that are only available on higher priced models. And freely configurable inputs/ouputs. and a third input for aux fed subs etc......
-1 for thought terminating cliches.

Built and/or own:
8 x T48 24" 3015LF
6 x DR280
2 x DR250 old style beta10
2 x T36s 20" delta15L
1 x TAT
1 x dual Lab12 30" T60

In Progress:
2 x DR280

User avatar
AntonZ
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 6:00 am
Location: NL

Re: New BF system

#26 Post by AntonZ »

I think that's exactly why they loose a lot of business to Behringer, who make a more flexible product with relative ease of operation for a better price. My guess is successors to the DCX/DEQ will only come after DBX brings more in the Driverack PA price range. They have no other competition near their price point. Bad reputation for DOA's is the only real problem for Behringer.
(or should I say "issue" :horse: )

gdougherty
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:13 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: New BF system

#27 Post by gdougherty »

AntonZ wrote:I think that's exactly why they loose a lot of business to Behringer, who make a more flexible product with relative ease of operation for a better price. My guess is successors to the DCX/DEQ will only come after DBX brings more in the Driverack PA price range. They have no other competition near their price point. Bad reputation for DOA's is the only real problem for Behringer.
(or should I say "issue" :horse: )
I had a conversation with some support people from dbx after I returned the DriveRack 260 I played with for a week. I highly recommended they look at the interface and feature set of the DEQ/DCX combo for any future units replacing the DRPA or 260. They seemed to think that their product was just fine and that having the software interface as an option to the clunky panel UI was a reasonable solution. I'd love to see a real competitor to the Behringer combo from dbx in a reasonable price range. I'd probably buy one in a heartbeat, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.

Mikey
Posts: 3756
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Pahrump, Nevada, USA

Re: New BF system

#28 Post by Mikey »

AntonZ wrote:I think that's exactly why they loose a lot of business to Behringer, who make a more flexible product with relative ease of operation for a better price. My guess is successors to the DCX/DEQ will only come after DBX brings more in the Driverack PA price range. They have no other competition near their price point. Bad reputation for DOA's is the only real problem for Behringer.
I just wish Behringer would fix their design to be reliable, or someone else would provide a reliable, similar product in the same price range. My rack is about a decade overdue for needing replacement, but I'm afraid that anything I buy is going to be unreliable. Reading reviews on "inexpensive" rack gear, it seems like NOTHING is reliable anymore. How in the hell can a company keep having products returned for the same reason and NOT do something to alleviate that problem? I really like the features of the DCX, but I'm not going to buy a piece of gear that I KNOW to be extremely unreliable.

User avatar
Harley
Posts: 5758
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand - Authorised BFM Cab Builder

Re: New BF system

#29 Post by Harley »

Mikey wrote:... How in the hell can a company keep having products returned for the same reason and NOT do something to alleviate that problem?.
I seem to recall the same conversation about a certain brand of drivers and the way they were packaged.

It's all about making products by slave labour!..and the numbers game.

Let's face it, 99% of the German V2 Rockets ( made by slave labour ) blew up within 15 minutes after they were launched. :wall:
ImageSemi-retired: Former Australia and New Zealand Authorised BFM cab builder.

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28916
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: New BF system

#30 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

How in the hell can a company keep having products returned for the same reason and NOT do something to alleviate that problem?.
Google 'Ford Pinto gas tank'. When the end of the world comes all that will be left are cockroaches, lawyers and accountants. Which is to say all that will be left are cockroaches. :roll:

Post Reply