BillFitzmaurice.info

Posted: **Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:50 am**

ajdroid wrote:
DJ Nada wrote:I'm in the process of building almost exactly the same thing. Does it have enough bass?
Hi DJ - For its size quite it has quite a bit. I think most though are of the opinion that the T39 will get you more bang for your buck. Normally you'd choose Tuba's over Titans if you need the lows to go a bit lower. But if you're only building 2 T24's you're not going below 45Hz anyways which I think is what a T39 is crossed at.

Best of luck to you!

AJ

The t24 or the Titan is really just a matter of what you shape prefer. I could see a Tuba 24 make sense in occasions where you get into the "sin" of pole mounting some sla's on top of the subs. Its not the best placement option, but an often requested setup for hire jobs. The titans are a bit top heavy, depending on driver, so its less practical.

Posted: **Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:44 am**

Assuming that the additional driver gives you an extra 3dB, this is what you get:

So that is:
8 cubic feet for the dual BP102 T24, 414cc
10.6 cubic feet for the 3012LF 24" T39, 494cc
8.8 cubic feet for the 3012LF 20" T39, 494cc

Posted: **Mon Dec 24, 2012 5:00 am**

I wasn't trying to say that they are the same in output, but both will have "plenty of bass" for most smaller setups. I do know the Titans go louder, thats why i build them.

Posted: **Mon Dec 24, 2012 5:40 am**

I was just trying to demonstrate that the T24 was perfectly capable and even though it less sensitive in some areas, it is a damn fine cab. Not in response to any post, just data.

BillFitzmaurice.info

SLA Pros and 24" T-24 Duallys

Re: SLA Pros and 24" T-24 Duallys

Re: SLA Pros and 24" T-24 Duallys

Re: SLA Pros and 24" T-24 Duallys

Re: SLA Pros and 24" T-24 Duallys