chunkymunkey_1 wrote:and it reflects sound and absorbs vibration...big difference.
Sound
is vibration. No sympathetic vibrations are wanted inside the horn path. Braces, spaced no more than 8" apart, solve any issue there.
chunkymunkey_1 wrote:Well i think its a good idea, its the same price as duratex plus vibration dampening. Does nobody else see ANY advantages to this? Anyway, i got my 1/2" BB today and laid out the first side, i'll cut all my parts tmw! Woot!
If it had any advantage, it would have been included in the plans. Bill's designs have been used very successfully for quite some time now. And, the product you listed is more expensive than DuraTex, by over US$10 per gallon. Add to the equation that DuraTex is an externally applied speaker enclosure covering, and the Cascade is a dampening material, designed to reduce, or dampen, automotive panel flexing (sheet metal) by applying it to the inside of the panels. Just so you know, it never hardens, as it would chip and crack off the sheet metal as it naturally flexes.
chunkymunkey_1 wrote:i dont want to be unique, i want better results. How do you know its not better if you have never tried it or even heard of it? i'm a perfectionist, soo if theres something better i'm using it.
Are you a sound/acoustical engineer? Do you have
any experience designing, modeling, researching, engineering, etc, a horn-loaded subwoofer enclosure? Bill has been doing this for a long time, has the degree, has the experience, and has been published. No offense, but I, personally, will bow to Bill's expertise.
Oh, and BTW, what makes you think that dampening material
hasn't been used/tested, and it's NFG for this application? If anyone had used it with success on the forum, there would be a positive posting.
I know money often seals the deal, but seriously, quality is an investment, not an expense... Grant Bunter
Accept the fact that airtight and well-braced are more important than pretty on the inside. Bill Fitzmaurice