Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Message
Author
gtrdrumsplayerduarte
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 11:21 am

Re: Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

#16 Post by gtrdrumsplayerduarte »

Any help discussing the dynamic range of the FM Transmitter? Does anybody can give a idea if it`s possible to achieve a quality like that TAKSTAR model using a good FM transmitter?

User avatar
dswpro
Posts: 314
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:17 pm

Re: Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

#17 Post by dswpro »

FM transmitters have a very limited dynamic range if I recall but they are better than nothing.

A while back I looked carefully into streaming audio over Wifi to use a cellphone as an IEM. ( I am a programmer in my day job) Android has a HAL ( Hardware abstraction layer) with a 100 millisecond buffer for audio playback. This is not alterable through app software though it is possible a custom ROM could shorten it. This buffer makes an Android phone pretty useless as an in ear monitor. The IOS platform is pretty locked down so I didn't even bother looking there after my Android investigations.

I think most singers could live with an IEM latency of just under 5 MS. Any longer and their voice will begin to really chorus with their IEM feed. Guitar players and percussionists could possibly stand up to a 10 MS delay. No delay is ideal, but neither is spending 300-1000 USD for a dedicated IEM transmitter / receiver.

gtrdrumsplayerduarte
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 11:21 am

Re: Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

#18 Post by gtrdrumsplayerduarte »

There are some apps that carry audio trough WIFI to android phone and I`ve tested that just to make a wireless playback system. Latency wasn`t a thing to consider for that kind of porpose.
It`s useless for IEM.

Just to add something for the comunity. There`s no latency with FM radio on the android phones I`ve tested but there was noticible latency on a Windows Phone I tested.

iamlowsound
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:46 pm
Location: Listowel Ontario

Re: Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

#19 Post by iamlowsound »

Wired in ears are really cheap and much better than wireless. I set our entire church up for less than $300, plus actual in ears, which is the expensive part anyway.

lowsound

User avatar
BrentEvans
Posts: 3041
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
Location: Salisbury, NC

Re: Poor Man's Wireless In Ear monitors

#20 Post by BrentEvans »

iamlowsound wrote:Wired in ears are really cheap and much better than wireless. I set our entire church up for less than $300, plus actual in ears, which is the expensive part anyway.

lowsound
+1. If you use a wired mic, you can use wired ears (except maybe for a lead singer that moves a lot).

For fixed position bands... wired is the way to go.
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.

Post Reply