GRS PZ1016

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Post Reply
Message
Author
djtrumptight
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:08 pm
Location: Detroit,Michigan

GRS PZ1016

#1 Post by djtrumptight »

Are these tweeters worth considering for BFM cabs ? I read a few links someone posted where Bill told someone to stick with the Goldwoods but that was over 2 years ago and since everybody is out of the Goldwoods until the end of the month :noob:
Built:
2 Autotuba's MCM 55 2421
8 T48's 24"wide 3015 LF
2 DR 250's melded Deltalite II 2510
2 DR 250's flat Deltalite II 2510
2 SLA HT systems
1 Table Tuba Dayton DCS 255-4
2 T 39's 20" wide 3012 LF
1 T-18 13" wide MCM 55 2421
2 SLA Pro's

djtrumptight
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:08 pm
Location: Detroit,Michigan

Re: GRS PZ1016

#2 Post by djtrumptight »

Nobody knows ?
Built:
2 Autotuba's MCM 55 2421
8 T48's 24"wide 3015 LF
2 DR 250's melded Deltalite II 2510
2 DR 250's flat Deltalite II 2510
2 SLA HT systems
1 Table Tuba Dayton DCS 255-4
2 T 39's 20" wide 3012 LF
1 T-18 13" wide MCM 55 2421
2 SLA Pro's

Bruce Weldy
Posts: 8539
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX

Re: GRS PZ1016

#3 Post by Bruce Weldy »

I don't know, but the remarks on Parts Express cast some doubt on their quality.

6 - T39 3012LF
4 - OT12 2512
1 - T24
1 - SLA Pro
2 - XF210


"A system with a few knobs set up by someone who knows what they are doing is always better than one with a lot of knobs set up by someone who doesn't."

Curtybob
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:48 pm
Location: Cape Girardeau, MO

Re: GRS PZ1016

#4 Post by Curtybob »

I have these in two melded arrays I built for a pair of DR250s. They are a bit more harsh, but seem to have a touch more in the 1-2K range. Once I run the auto EQ on the Driverack, they sound just fine. But I did have a lot more duds. Out of 60 tweeters, I had 17 bad ones.

User avatar
Rick Lee
Posts: 1236
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: Tullahoma, Tennessee

Re: GRS PZ1016

#5 Post by Rick Lee »

I haven't had any issues with them. The piezo element is larger than the Goldwood (as shown on PE's picture) and has a lower rolloff. Quality seems to be the same as the goldwood. Ratio of good ones to duds is about the same as the goldwood. I've graphed both and the GRS isn't any peakier than the Goldwood.
Authorized Builder
Nashville/Middle Tennessee

bwtaudio@gmail.com

Brian Steele
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am

Re: GRS PZ1016

#6 Post by Brian Steele »

I've tried both. The GW build quality seems a bit better, but the GRS' larger piezo element allows it to go a bit lower.

For something interesting, try a GRS back on a GW horn. If done a few tests of that "frankenpiezo" combination and the results a pretty good - they go lower in frequency and have a smoother passband response (the GW horn is better in some ways than the GRS one).

Post Reply