Review of the Pono player

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Message
Author
ripNdeb
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:57 pm
Location: Eureka, CA
Contact:

Re: Review of the Pono player

#16 Post by ripNdeb »

Who cares, really? 5%, 2%, of folks who actually 'listen' to music?
2X OTop 112, 3012HO, melded - 2X T39, 27", Lab 12 - XF 212 - 4 DR250, 2 melded, 2 straight
2 20" T39 3012LF - WH10 - WH8 - in the shop - 2 more 20" T39s
http://saltandlighteureka.org still need a trailer :)

User avatar
escapemcp
Posts: 1219
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Review of the Pono player

#17 Post by escapemcp »

Tom Smit wrote:There is a new method out (the name of which escapes me) that apparently preserves some of the dynamics yet helps control volume levels.
R 128 from the EBU.
Image

Awful logo... how long did it take them on mspaint to design that thing?? Engineersartists.
I suppose it's better than blowing the whole budget on the logo though :mrgreen:

Rich4349
Posts: 880
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:18 am
Location: Kankakee, IL

Re: Review of the Pono player

#18 Post by Rich4349 »

Radian wrote: I've "wow'd" several people in the last couple of years with a Sansa Clip+, playing FLAC files of well-mastered music over an old pair of 1st gen Sony MDR-E828LP ear buds. From old farts to the kiddies.

For under $100, the sound of this combination simply runs circles around most anything priced an order of magnitude higher.

Image
shown with the even better sounding MDR-AS40EX in-ears
I had an old school Sansa (matchbook size, don't remember the model, got it on woot about 5 years ago) and was pretty pleased with it. Other than the fact that the Clip+ plays FLAC files, is there something special about that model?

And: just picked up a pair of your recommended ear buds; we'll see how they stack up against my plain old pair of $25 Sonys. (that seem to play flatly enough for me)
2 DR250s, 2 27" Lab15 T-60s, 2 30" Neo Titan 39s, 1 Autotuba...and looking for more!

User avatar
SimonD
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:14 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Re: Review of the Pono player

#19 Post by SimonD »

Ryan Sober wrote:Now, what else started getting big in the late 80's/early 90's...
And became an easy scapegoat for bad-sounding music...
Ever tried using one of these? "?"
Built
2 x DR250 (Kappalite 3010MB, ASD1001S)
2 X T39 24" (Kappalite 3012LF)

Ryan Sober
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Review of the Pono player

#20 Post by Ryan Sober »

SimonD wrote:
Ryan Sober wrote:Now, what else started getting big in the late 80's/early 90's...
And became an easy scapegoat for bad-sounding music...
Ever tried using one of these? "?"
I call those "leading ellipses."
I use them because I'm not asking for an answer; I'm trying to lead you into figuring out the answer on your own.
Because if you think about it for more than .2 seconds, the answer should make itself clear.

byacey
Posts: 947
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:09 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: Review of the Pono player

#21 Post by byacey »

Bruce Weldy wrote: And the reason the kiddies don't care is that the music they are listening to is so compressed from a dynamics standpoint that it really doesn't sound any worse on MP3 than CD.

Every now and then I turn on one of the local county stations......geez, it really starts to bug the crap out of me after just a minute or two - from the compression in recording to the compression at mastering - then the compression that the station squashes it with......everything just comes at you like a 2x4. There's no life at all - it's just a wall of sound (and not the Phil Spector kind).

Maybe it's just our society now.....everybody gets a participation award so they don't get their feelings hurt. So, on the recording, everybody has to be equal and be at the same volume to keep everybody's self esteem intact. Wouldn't want that lead vocal to be louder than the tambourine player....now would we?
I must be leftover from the stone age. When I master, I shoot for an RMS level of -16dbfs averaged over a 15 second excerpt. This gives me a reasonably punchy average level with some headroom left for dynamics.
Built
T48s
WH8s
SX212

User avatar
Radian
Posts: 2032
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Review of the Pono player

#22 Post by Radian »

Rich4349 wrote:Other than the fact that the Clip+ plays FLAC files, is there something special about that model?
That, and the addition of the SD card lot. The unit shown in that pic is sporting a 128 GB card...just under half my music library in butter-smooth FLAC quality, on tap.
Rich4349 wrote:And: just picked up a pair of your recommended ear buds; we'll see how they stack up against my plain old pair of $25 Sonys.
8)
Last edited by Radian on Thu Feb 19, 2015 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Good food, good people, good times.

4 - AT
1 - TT
1 - THT Slim
2 - SLA Pro 4x6 Alphalite

User avatar
escapemcp
Posts: 1219
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:57 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Review of the Pono player

#23 Post by escapemcp »

Radian wrote:
escapemcp wrote:And: just picked up a pair of your recommended ear buds; we'll see how they stack up against my plain old pair of $25 Sonys.
I never said that!! :mrgreen:
For the record, my recommended buds are SoundMagic E10s. They are another little gem I discovered coming from China.
Image
I love finding the cheap (but good) stuff :)

User avatar
Radian
Posts: 2032
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Review of the Pono player

#24 Post by Radian »

Woops! :oops: Sorry about that. Fixed. :)
Good food, good people, good times.

4 - AT
1 - TT
1 - THT Slim
2 - SLA Pro 4x6 Alphalite

Post Reply