432Hz

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Message
Author

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28916
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: 432Hz

#2 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Yeah, right. You forgot to include the author's picture:

Image

CoronaOperator
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada

Re: 432Hz

#3 Post by CoronaOperator »

Why do 434Hz when you can tune to 333hz? Or much lower to 33Hz?
Built:
17" width 10" driver Autotuba
2 x 29" width dual Lab12 Tuba60
6 x DR250 2510/asd1001
In progress:
2 x DR250 2510/asd1001
For best results, point the loud end of the array towards the audience

byacey
Posts: 947
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:09 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: 432Hz

#4 Post by byacey »

I'm not sure why you would take the time to read this sort of thing, but if you do some serious research, you will find concert pitch has been all over the map in the last 400 years.

I don't believe the Nazis had anything to do with arriving at 440, If there is any legitimate supportive literature supporting this theory, I would be interested in reading this.
Built
T48s
WH8s
SX212

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28916
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: 432Hz

#5 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

byacey wrote: I don't believe the Nazis had anything to do with arriving at 440, If there is any legitimate supportive literature supporting this theory, I would be interested in reading this.
Not that 440 matters, it's an arbitrary assignment anyway. It's the frequency in Hz assigned to the middle 'A' note, which in and of itself means absolutely nothing. You don't like a song played in the key of A? Play it in A flat. The author of that treatise must have flunked both history and music theory. :noob:

Bruce Weldy
Posts: 8539
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX

Re: 432Hz

#6 Post by Bruce Weldy »

Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:
byacey wrote: I don't believe the Nazis had anything to do with arriving at 440, If there is any legitimate supportive literature supporting this theory, I would be interested in reading this.
Not that 440 matters, it's an arbitrary assignment anyway. It's the frequency in Hz assigned to the middle 'A' note, which in and of itself means absolutely nothing. You don't like a song played in the key of A? Play it in A flat. The author of that treatise must have flunked both history and music theory. :noob:

Actually, it's not even about changing key by a half step....it's more ridiculous than that - the change suggested in only about a third of the way to the next semitone (half step).

But, none of that really matters, because he feels better when listening to music that way......sheesh. Nothing like objective testing......

6 - T39 3012LF
4 - OT12 2512
1 - T24
1 - SLA Pro
2 - XF210


"A system with a few knobs set up by someone who knows what they are doing is always better than one with a lot of knobs set up by someone who doesn't."

User avatar
BrentEvans
Posts: 3041
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
Location: Salisbury, NC

Re: 432Hz

#7 Post by BrentEvans »

Bruce Weldy wrote:

But, none of that really matters, because he feels better when listening to music that way......sheesh. Nothing like objective testing......
Not that I'm on board with this particular psycho-acoustic diatribe, but the personal perception of music can't really be tested objectively. It's kind of like trying to describe "red" to a blind man. You can tell him things that are red, tell him how red makes you feel, or even explain how certain wavelengths of light activate parts of the eye, but you'll never make him see "red" in his mind. we don't have the words for that.

It certainly is possible that certain frequencies vibrate people's ears differently. If he finds music tuned to 432hz to be more pleasant that other tunings, who are we to argue?

I would be interested, though, to see a double blind study on this.
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28916
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: 432Hz

#8 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

BrentEvans wrote:It certainly is possible that certain frequencies vibrate people's ears differently.
All it means is that the instruments will be tuned a tiny bit lower. They won't sound any different. The person who wrote this piffle has no idea what 440Hz tuning means, let alone how tuning an instrument higher or lower would make any difference to what's heard. This stuff is as scientifically valid as astrology.

Grant Bunter
Posts: 6912
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:12 am
Location: Ilfracombe Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: 432Hz

#9 Post by Grant Bunter »

42
Built:
DR 250: x 2 melded array, 2x CD horn, March 2012 plans.
T39's: 4 x 20" KL3010LF , 2 x 28" 3012LF.
WH8: x 6 with melded array wired series/parallel.
Bunter's Audio and Lighting "like"s would be most appreciated...

byacey
Posts: 947
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:09 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Re: 432Hz

#10 Post by byacey »

If 432Hz makes him feel good and at one with the universe, and 440Hz creates inner turmoil and anxiety; what happens when a violinist plays 4th finger vibrato on the D string? Violent mood swings?
Built
T48s
WH8s
SX212

User avatar
Ian Westwood
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:35 am
Location: Apple Valley, CA

Re: 432Hz

#11 Post by Ian Westwood »

Grant Bunter wrote:42
Finally someone is making sense.

The answer to the ultimate question of Life, the universe, and everything.
Image

Authorized BFM Builder

David Raehn
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:56 pm
Location: Colonial Beach VA

Re: 432Hz

#12 Post by David Raehn »

In some blues it is considered the 'sad' side of the note. Not completely flat, mind you. There is a difference in tuning a few cents one way or another, but that's art....
BFM rig:
6 OT12
4 T48
4 WH8
Other:
56 box Electrotec LabQ rig
Way too many cables
:noob:

User avatar
Israel
Posts: 586
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Moca Puerto Rico

Re: 432Hz

#13 Post by Israel »

next time I do something bad ill blame the 440hz tune
There is a very thin line between fail and success. It is very thin so, why are you scared???


MADE
4- OT12'S BETAII
4 T39'S 20" 3012LF LOADED
ON THE BENCH: 2 OT212

User avatar
bitSmasher
Posts: 628
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 2:55 am
Location: Sydney, Aus.

Re: 432Hz

#14 Post by bitSmasher »

don't blame it on the...
..etc...
...blame it on the 440

I'd be more interested in listening to changing from minor to major keys, or the other way around. Good string of vids on youtube, no doubt your favourite music has had this treatment - would post some examples but can't get youtube at work.

Grant Bunter
Posts: 6912
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:12 am
Location: Ilfracombe Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: 432Hz

#15 Post by Grant Bunter »

byacey wrote:...you will find concert pitch has been all over the map in the last 400 years.
If anyone is interested, Hermann von Hemholtz's work "On the sensations of tone", in particular the chapter called "The history of musical tuning in Europe".

https://ia600208.us.archive.org/9/items ... lmrich.pdf

reportably span nearly 2000 years of tuning standards.

When I get a chance, I'll read it, but if someone gets there before me, please let me know if A440 came up anytime as the standard before 1926...
Built:
DR 250: x 2 melded array, 2x CD horn, March 2012 plans.
T39's: 4 x 20" KL3010LF , 2 x 28" 3012LF.
WH8: x 6 with melded array wired series/parallel.
Bunter's Audio and Lighting "like"s would be most appreciated...

Post Reply