And should be one of the sayings of the forum IMOTom Smit wrote:
+1 that's what Bill has been suggesting for yeeaaaarrrsss.


And should be one of the sayings of the forum IMOTom Smit wrote:
+1 that's what Bill has been suggesting for yeeaaaarrrsss.
I'll test it as soon as I get the multimeter back, I can say that the sub synth causes approximately twice the amount of excursion on my monitors at home when set to +15dB, but it will be interesting to see if the onboard limiter can keep being pushed to higher voltages with more DSP settings adding gain to the signalDJPhatman wrote:Could you also test with adding the "sub synth" engaged? I have a feeling that will also push the voltage higher.
Exactly my thoughts. I don't have access to my XTi amps, as they are buried in winter storage.DJ Terrabass wrote:I'll test it as soon as I get the multimeter back, I can say that the sub synth causes approximately twice the amount of excursion on my monitors at home when set to +15dB, but it will be interesting to see if the onboard limiter can keep being pushed to higher voltages with more DSP settings adding gain to the signal
The only thing 'sub synths' are good for is blowing drivers. Don't use it.DJ Terrabass wrote:
I'll test it as soon as I get the multimeter back, I can say that the sub synth causes approximately twice the amount of excursion on my monitors
And, you know, some people just have to do things "Their way"Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:The only thing 'sub synths' are good for is blowing drivers. Don't use it.DJ Terrabass wrote:
I'll test it as soon as I get the multimeter back, I can say that the sub synth causes approximately twice the amount of excursion on my monitors
As long as your HPF and limiters are after the the "sub synth" or whatever, it would work fine and not cause any more excursion than normal since the max voltage is set by the limiter and the HPF kills anything below that frequency anyway. This is only assuming you are using them though. It probably won't sound good to have the sub synth squashed by the limiter though.DJPhatman wrote:Exactly my thoughts. I don't have access to my XTi amps, as they are buried in winter storage.DJ Terrabass wrote:I'll test it as soon as I get the multimeter back, I can say that the sub synth causes approximately twice the amount of excursion on my monitors at home when set to +15dB, but it will be interesting to see if the onboard limiter can keep being pushed to higher voltages with more DSP settings adding gain to the signalI know they will cause over-excursion in cabs not meant to reproduce sub bass, and I have tried it outdoors with my T39s, but I didn't like the sound of it. Just sounded phony to me. After hearing the T39s, everything else sounds "off". I am so spoiled!
If its letting through more voltage its either not a real limiter or its in the wrong place in the signal chain.DJ Terrabass wrote: And should be one of the sayings of the forum IMO. Also just did some more testing with the onboard EQ and band-pass gain almost as high as it can go and found the limiter lets even more peak voltage through with that setup. The 61volt peak @-3dB limit might get closer to explaining blown 3015lf driver's
This is why I want to know. DJ Terrabass has already shown that the limiter does NOT provide brick-wall limiting. I would like to know what else effects the limiter.ryan222h wrote:As long as your HPF and limiters are after the the "sub synth" or whatever, it would work fine and not cause any more excursion than normal since the max voltage is set by the limiter and the HPF kills anything below that frequency anyway.
Because they haven't been used in over 2 years due to my poor health. I am currently unable to gig, so all my audio equipement is in storage.ryan222h wrote:The real question here is why are your xti amps in winter storage? I would have those ready and willing to be test subjects
DING, DING, DING! We 'ave a winna!!ryan222h wrote:If its letting through more voltage its ... or its in the wrong place in the signal chain.
What about changing the limiter settings? Were the input gains wide open, and the input signal just below clipping? This is great information, DJ Terrabass! Thanks for doing and posting your experiment.DJ Terrabass wrote:Just tested with the Xti2000's limiter set to -3dB and there wasn't any noticeable increase in voltage using the subsynth gen until about +5dB. The +15dB setting raised the peak voltages to just under 64V max, so I think if every stage in the signal chain used maximum possible gain, the voltages could reach ~65V Max
Hi againDJPhatman wrote: What about changing the limiter settings? Were the input gains wide open, and the input signal just below clipping? This is great information, DJ Terrabass! Thanks for doing and posting your experiment.
the 2002 series limits via voltage.DJ Terrabass wrote:DJPhatman wrote:
Will also be interested to see how the new limiters on the Xti2002 compare with the legacy XTi series limiter
They all limit via voltage, but I understand that you can select the voltage on the XTi xx02 models. But, do they limit before or after all the EQ, Synthbass, etc. Seeing as the legacy XTi is after the limiter, it's reasonable to expect the new model will work the same way.netwerks wrote:the 2002 series limits via voltage.DJ Terrabass wrote:DJPhatman wrote:
Will also be interested to see how the new limiters on the Xti2002 compare with the legacy XTi series limiter
|