BrentEvans wrote:You're probably right about training. However, one can always push his boundaries.
For sure. I feel I "pushed my boundaries" quite a bit during my second year of mixing. I was simply saying that the fact that I mix the way I do is most likely a result of how I was trained, not that I some how believe that because I was trained a certain way that I must mix that way.
BrentEvans wrote:Think about the "why" of what you're doing when you mix, and see if it changes your perspective.
I believe I do think about the "why", but perhaps I don't dive deep enough. When I wonder why the vocals don't sound like they're properly blended, my answer tends to be "because one of them is too loud" as opposed to "one of them needs to be EQ'd differently". If the mix as a whole sounds muddy, I look to what instruments I can turn up or down as opposed to what frequencies. And so on. Again, I believe this is because I spent my first year of mixing using the channel faders to fix all of my problems. Now, if that wasn't working, I'd figure something else out, but it seems like I can fix most problems that I hear in a mix using channel faders.
BrentEvans wrote:
I will say this... unless you have loads of processing on every channel (SAC or some other digital board) the paradigm is different... so you may not have the tool to fix whatever is causing the imbalance other than the channel fader. However... if you think about why it is what it is, perhaps you can improve it.
I do have a 4-band semi-parametric EQ on each channel, and up to 24 compressors and gates. So I've got access to plenty of processing.