JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Very interesting test! Nice looking cabs as well.
-
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:23 am
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
I like the real world comparisons. 

-
- Posts: 3495
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56 pm
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
I missed this before.Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:Not really. Peak ratings are advertising crap. At one point the FTC banned the use of anything but RMS. Then the Reagan administration came in and put the foxes in charge of the hen houses and that was the end of that. Peak ratings are meaningless and should be ignored. And mechanical limits tend to be lower than RMS.ryan222h wrote: Peak ratings show that when the juice really gets flowing, the driver will be up to the task, both thermally and mechanically.
For a couple of compliant non plan AT drivers you have given a limit voltage working out to be the rated RMS power at nominal driver impedance. I have taken this as a trend and reported it to a few enquiries about this or that without you raising a comment so I wonder if you might confirm the notion of AT being an exception to the general
Is this the reason there is no voltage limit specified for AT?And mechanical limits tend to be lower than RMS.
BAT10, Bad Auto Tuba. Reverse folded TAT to fit JBL 1014D, 350W driver, voltage limit unknown.
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
There's a voltage limit for all driver/box combinations...Bill was trying to explain why RMS is more important than peak. One of the reasons he thinks peak ratings are gibberish is because the mechanical limits of the driver (overexcursion, etc.) are going to happen at a lower power than even RMS, let alone peak, power. This is true at least at very low frequencies around the drivers lowest usable frequency and lower, and also when the driver is not horn loaded.Gregory East wrote:Is this the reason there is no voltage limit specified for AT?
I would like to see these two AT's do a max voltage shootout! Would be interesting to see which one holds up better. Of course, I wouldn't want you to blow up your brand new drivers in the process!
Beautiful looking boxes, by the way!

Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
+1ryan222h wrote: I would like to see these two AT's do a max voltage shootout! Would be interesting to see which one holds up better. Of course, I wouldn't want you to burn up your brand new drivers in the process!
Need to find a practical & affordable way to measure/monitor the cone movement while inside the cab...

Authorized Builder
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 28916
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Cars don't have limiters.Gregory East wrote:Is this the reason there is no voltage limit specified for AT?
-
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:23 am
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Temporary acrylic or Plexiglass access panel cover?N.Webber wrote: Need to find a practical & affordable way to measure/monitor the cone movement while inside the cab...
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
While I'm waiting for some accessories for the car install, and as I am planning on building a set of the David floor standers,
I decided to try and simulate these with the AT toped with a small bookshelf speaker, as in the David configuration.
Like this:

The AT was lifted on top of 6" spacers and placed near the room corner.
The cabs were driven through an active 2 way x-over (crossed at about 100Hz) and separate amp. channels.
I was pleasantly surprised by the good balance and low end extension of this setup.
Apart for the earlier noted peaks, the overall response was quite smooth and very pleasant - I am tempted to say Hi Fi.
I wasn't expecting any substantial reproduction below 35Hz but it was defiantly there, down to even 25Hz!
This is the measured response of the setup + room:

Mind you, I wasn't trying to determine the maximum level of this setup, but I felt there was enough headroom to enable serious levels, if needed…

I decided to try and simulate these with the AT toped with a small bookshelf speaker, as in the David configuration.
Like this:

The AT was lifted on top of 6" spacers and placed near the room corner.
The cabs were driven through an active 2 way x-over (crossed at about 100Hz) and separate amp. channels.
I was pleasantly surprised by the good balance and low end extension of this setup.
Apart for the earlier noted peaks, the overall response was quite smooth and very pleasant - I am tempted to say Hi Fi.
I wasn't expecting any substantial reproduction below 35Hz but it was defiantly there, down to even 25Hz!
This is the measured response of the setup + room:

Mind you, I wasn't trying to determine the maximum level of this setup, but I felt there was enough headroom to enable serious levels, if needed…

Authorized Builder
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
-
- Posts: 3495
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56 pm
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Yep, that's how BAT gets used too.
BAT10, Bad Auto Tuba. Reverse folded TAT to fit JBL 1014D, 350W driver, voltage limit unknown.
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
What panel width did you use on your AT's? Also, subjectively speaking, do both sound exactly the same to your ears or does one sound louder or have different tonal characteristics than the other? I'm curious if, and to what extent, different drivers change the overall sound. Looking forward to updates
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
By-ear comparisons of horns using band-pass limited signals yields no subjectively useful data. I have done this with a few horn designs too, proving to myself, what Bill already states in the FAQ's section. They have no characteristic "tone".ryan222h wrote:I'm curious if, and to what extent, different drivers change the overall sound.
One cab will simply play louder than another at different frequencies ( ie. differences in frequency response)...as shown in the previous graphs, but it's nice to finally get an idea by how much. The JBL is a great piece of kit, if you've want to get spendy.

Nimrod's cabs are always something to pore over.

Good food, good people, good times.
4 - AT
1 - TT
1 - THT Slim
2 - SLA Pro 4x6 Alphalite
4 - AT
1 - TT
1 - THT Slim
2 - SLA Pro 4x6 Alphalite
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Actually, the JBL cost less online than the TB, depending on where you shop I suppose. I got mine from the popular online auction site.Radian wrote:The JBL is a great piece of kit, if you've want to get spendy.
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
Overall width is 400mm, so the panels are 376mm (about 14-3/4")ryan222h wrote:What panel width did you use on your AT's?
As much as I tried to find a point of difference between the two, I just couldn't.Also, subjectively speaking, do both sound exactly the same to your ears or does one sound louder or have different tonal characteristics than the other?
I kept switching between the cabs while listening to various pieces of music and simply couldn't notice any difference between the JBL and the TB.
In terms of level/sensitivity, response, or tonality both cabs appeared to sound identical.
Next week I hope to manage the comparison/test in my wife's car…

Authorized Builder
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
-
- Posts: 3495
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 9:56 pm
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
What gear do you need to run the comparison test?
BAT10, Bad Auto Tuba. Reverse folded TAT to fit JBL 1014D, 350W driver, voltage limit unknown.
Re: JBL 804 vs TangBand 740P
I am currently preparing a portable 'kit' that will enable a quick and simple hookup to any car. This is intended mainly for demonstration purposes of the AT. The kit will include an input level (volume) control, a 2 way electronic crossover, a two channel amplifier (bridged for the AT) and an A/B selector switch for the output. All these components will be held together in a light and compact wooden open frame/rack, with all the inter-connections already wired up.Gregory East wrote:What gear do you need to run the comparison test?
The idea is to be able to drop the (demo) AT into any car, hookup the rack to the car's 12v, connect the AT and the car's existing sub (if there is one), take the HF output from the rack's XO into the cars HU (thus using the car's system for the mid/high reproduction) and feeding the rack from any available music source.
This system will also be used for the comparison test of the tow ATs, with both ATs placed in the car and connected to the outputs of the A/B switch.
Apart from a thorough listening test, I intend to measure the output and plot the response of the ATs using TrueRTA.
Pictures and report will follow...

Authorized Builder
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...
- 6 DR290
- Omni10.5
- AT, TAT
- Tuba 48
- 2 WH10
- Truck Tuba
http://www.boniton.co.il
http://www.bt-12.com Balanced Tilting Sounds Better...