Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

The hows and whys of running sound.
Message
Author
User avatar
Bryson
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Wa

Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#1 Post by Bryson »

I'm looking to get a small mixer... Seems that the Mackies were great but the over all web opinion of them has gone down. The 1202 fits the bill pretty well. Don't really need anything larger than that or any more features. What do you guys think? They seem to come up on Craigslist often for a decent used deal...

Thanks!
Done: 2 x Dual Loaded T24 (BP102), 2 x 16in T24s (BP102), THT
Now: T18...
Next: ???

mattaudio
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#2 Post by mattaudio »

I picked up an Alesis MultiMix 8 USB FX off Craigslist for $60 and couldn't be happier.

It fits in the pouch of a case with a single power amp so is super easy to transport for one of my bands where we just need vocals for small bar gigs.

- 4 mic pres with low-cut
- 1 Pre-fader send for monitors
- 1 Post-fader routed to a simple internal effects processor
- A few extra line level stereo inputs
- USB for main mix recording and break music from a PC

Works well when I don't want to haul the StudioLive and spend a half hour setting up PA.

Mikey
Posts: 3756
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:05 am
Location: Pahrump, Nevada, USA

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#3 Post by Mikey »

Yamaha MG124CX. The little Yamahas are hard to beat. Check Full Compass and Northern Light & Sound for the best price.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot of courage, to move in the opposite direction."

Albert Einstein

mattaudio
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#4 Post by mattaudio »

The MG124 looks good. Mute switches, faders and most importantly a pre-fader send.

Before I had the MultiMix, I had a MG82 which had 4 mic pres, which I returned. It felt incredibly cheaply constructed, and it lacked the features I just listed above.

Bruce Weldy
Posts: 8539
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#5 Post by Bruce Weldy »

Mikey wrote:Yamaha MG124CX. The little Yamahas are hard to beat. Check Full Compass and Northern Light & Sound for the best price.
+1 on the Yamaha MG series....got one-love it.

6 - T39 3012LF
4 - OT12 2512
1 - T24
1 - SLA Pro
2 - XF210


"A system with a few knobs set up by someone who knows what they are doing is always better than one with a lot of knobs set up by someone who doesn't."

User avatar
LelandCrooks
Posts: 7242
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 9:36 am
Location: Midwest/Kansas/Speaker Nirvana
Contact:

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#6 Post by LelandCrooks »

+1
If it's too loud, you're even older than me! Like me.
http://www.speakerhardware.com

User avatar
Bryson
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Wa

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#7 Post by Bryson »

I missed a MG102C on craigslist for $40 the other day... so I'm still searching. $100 for a 1202-VLZ2 has shown up...
Done: 2 x Dual Loaded T24 (BP102), 2 x 16in T24s (BP102), THT
Now: T18...
Next: ???

User avatar
Bryson
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Wa

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#8 Post by Bryson »

For the same money, would you rather have Mackie 1402 VLZ3 or a Allen and Heath Zed14?
Done: 2 x Dual Loaded T24 (BP102), 2 x 16in T24s (BP102), THT
Now: T18...
Next: ???

Greg Plouvier
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:47 pm
Location: High Desert of Colorado - Licensed builder
Contact:

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#9 Post by Greg Plouvier »

Definitely AH
Greg Plouvier
http://www.magnumcaseworks.com
Protective casing, speaker cabinets, Colorado BF builder, A/V installation, sales, live sound

User avatar
Bryson
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Wa

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#10 Post by Bryson »

I've been looking at them all weekend. The AH has more of the features I like. Just have never used one. The Mackies are hard to get excited about anymore... Anybody own or used a Zed 14?
Done: 2 x Dual Loaded T24 (BP102), 2 x 16in T24s (BP102), THT
Now: T18...
Next: ???

User avatar
Chris_Allen
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:43 pm
Location: Huddersfield, UK

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#11 Post by Chris_Allen »

Allen and Heath mixers are tremendous! Genuiningly. They are still a true engineering company that doesn't make a bad product for the money.
Built:
6xDR200, 2xT39, 2xT48, 2xJack110, 1xOmni10.5, 1xAutotuba, 1xT18, 1xSLA Pro, 1xW8, 1xW10

User avatar
Drey Chennells
Posts: 1377
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:12 pm
Location: Central FL ~Authorized Builder
Contact:

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#12 Post by Drey Chennells »

used a GL2400 for a good bit, very nice.
"Things happen, but music stays in your blood forever~." bf

InfraCoustik
Consulting/Design/Fabrication
Authorized BF Builder
http://www.infracoustik.com/
info@infracoustik.com

User avatar
Bryson
Posts: 216
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:51 pm
Location: Wa

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#13 Post by Bryson »

After looking for a while, the AH seems to be the way to go. Illuminated mutes, Neutrik Jacks, long sliders, customizable midrange, peak indicators for each channel. All things I wish the Mackie had... I bought the Mackie at the Guitar Center presidents day sale but, I think it will go back soon...
Done: 2 x Dual Loaded T24 (BP102), 2 x 16in T24s (BP102), THT
Now: T18...
Next: ???

bzb
Posts: 1567
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#14 Post by bzb »

The Mackie boards are about as crap as the Behringers now.
Bobby Shively
Purveyor of fine aged hip hop
Traktor S4 - Vestax VCI-100 - TTX - MOTU Ultralite - Yamaha 01V

Built:
T39 13" BP102, 24" 3012LF - AT - OT12 2512 - SLA Pro - T24 - Jack 10
Powered by XTi 1000 & 2000

User avatar
BrentEvans
Posts: 3041
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
Location: Salisbury, NC

Re: Mackie 1202 VLZ or ?

#15 Post by BrentEvans »

bzb wrote:The Mackie boards are about as crap as the Behringers now.
Not quite, but close. They do still have a reasonable build quality... but they feel like a copy of a ripoff. (I.E. Behringer ripped off Mackie and then Mackie copied the feature sets of Behringers..... :noob: ).
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.

Post Reply