Turntablist wrote:Landl.livesound wrote:Remember you get what you pay for 9 times out of 10 in pro audio.
With the lower price range products I'd say your words that I quoted aren't true. 9 times out of 10 the manufacturer gives out BS specs.
Hey Turntablist,
With very lower end products, exactly they *might* be more stretched than usual. That is exactly why you get what you pay for and tell people to skip the low end Gemini, Pyle audio, Samson, etc. And you step up the entry level pro gear in the $600-1200 a box depending on your needs. The trick that I try to use is try and find bang-to-buck gear that performs as well as gear slightly more expensive than it costs. Like buying a speaker that costs $1000 that is comparable to speakers in the $1200-1800 range. I would call that a bang-to-buck buy. 99% of the time there is a reason why that $1500 speaker costs, $1500. And there will be reasons why the $700 is $700 and not $1500. Again this applies to respectable companies that are in the real world "Pro audio market".
Also, realize that respected pro audio companies do not "make-up" specs out of thin air. What some will do is use their marketing department side to make it "look" better. These specs will not be made up, and not pure "BS". They will just have to be taken in context. That is why a competent spec interpreter, like yourself, will be able to tell what is a useful spec and what isn't. Don't worry I believe, it makes it harder to know what the specs mean, but in no way are, "Pulled out of air, pure BS" so to say. That is why demoing and using is always the best way to get a feel for a potential purchase.
One way they do this is I know JBL back a while ago would sometimes quote +-3dB mark but then give a -3dB mark in addition, which was not taken from the average sensitivity like it should be. But that -3dB point was taken from the +-3dB point. So that means on a flatter sub, like the SRX718 they could take 6dB off, which would cover "+-3dB" which would be true because it is +-3dB. But then they would take another 3dB down from that as the -3dB down. So it could be up to -9dB down from average sensitivity. All this info isn't pure BS you just have to know where it comes from. And with someone smart like yourself you can interpret the specs how you want to.
BTW, I have personally measured several SRX718 and they measure surprisingly almost exactly how JBL publishes in their spec sheet.
Turntablist wrote:
With the usual manufacturing price/ resaler price ratio you'll pay five times the price it cost to build the thing.
Yes they have to make money and not only pay to build it and for parts. But to pay for all the designers for all the R&D, since a pro audio company that is known for high quality products must put in a lot of R&D to make sure that they put out a high quality product that lasts. Plus the resale value of non-demo'ed, name brand cabs that have a good track record can stay pretty high. But almost no pro audio guy would buy a DIY rig without first hearing and playing with it himself, plus you might not be able to get as much as a well-known cab made to spec.
Of course you can still get good money for a well made DIY rig, Mr. Nightro on the DJ Forums got a good amount of money for his BFM subs, and a big reason for this was the person heard the rig and liked what he heard plus they were made professionally. Mr. Nightro is moving to a commercial horn-loaded sub so I am looking very forward to his thoughts there.
And that is exactly the thing you save a lot on in DIY is you use your own time to do the building. Your own time to order the pieces and all else that goes into it. I think that is a very interesting part of DIY, especially the learning that you do while building your own cab. Which I think is big plus for DIY that you can't learn by having a full-built and warrantied cabinet dropped off at your door. Convenient, Oh ya; Do you learn nearly as much by making sawdust and experimenting, no. It is all a trade-off like everything in audio.
Take Care!