Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

Our easiest to build speaker lineup.
Post Reply
Message
Author
supertzar
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:15 am
Location: Finland

Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#1 Post by supertzar »

Hello.

I'm looking at building a pa sub for my band. Nothing too big. At the moment I'm fairly certain that a single 15" sub would be enough to add just that little extra to the situations where we have to use our own pa.

I got a nice offer for a couple of Faital drivers and by the plans I believe either 15FH500 or 520 should be ok to use as a subwoofer.

But I also play bass so I started thinking about the possibility of also trying the same cab for bass. I heard the 15PR400 is great for bass and the 15FH520 has same frequencies in the spec sheet. I can cut plywood and follow instructions but I'm not too familiar with the science behind speaker design. Could the same cab work getting the full range bass guitar from my amp AND getting the low passed signal from our pa (Not at the same time obviously)?

I have a nice bass rig already, so if the idea isn't viable I will just continue with building a pure subwoofer.

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28619
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#2 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

It could be done, but the response of the S15 sub will go a bit lower because the cabinet is larger and it's tuned lower. As for only needing one sub for PA, sure, if that PA is a pair of eight inch tops. Subs are to mains as the size of an iceberg below the waterline is to that which can be seen above. The wave lengths they handle are at least twice as long as that which the mains handle, as must be the size differential.

supertzar
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:15 am
Location: Finland

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#3 Post by supertzar »

Funnily enough, you got that one absolutely right. The tops for this would be an old 8" yamaha stagepas system that we use(-d to use) for the smallest events. Mostly vocals and acoustic guitar and usually in a corner of a little pub without actual stage or pa. Anything bigger, and here would either be foh provided by the venue or then we would just be towing "the big rig" with us.

Most of the time the yamaha works as it is. But as the drummer uses either a cajon or a loota percussion mic'd, I often find myself wanting that little extra oomph even if it would be only for the kick.

And I enjoy building stuff.

And this could potentially end up as an extra bonus for me personally in the bass guitar side of things.

So in this context, I am basically asking someone smarter than me to greenlight the idea where I accept to compromise for a double purpose cab. Would a Simplexx 15 with 15FH520 add any meaningful value to a 8" yamaha stagepas system that has a crossover at 120Hz when used with a subwoofer?

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28619
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#4 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

It would add plenty.

Bruce Weldy
Posts: 8301
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#5 Post by Bruce Weldy »

supertzar wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 9:50 am Funnily enough, you got that one absolutely right. The tops for this would be an old 8" yamaha stagepas system that we use(-d to use) for the smallest events. Mostly vocals and acoustic guitar and usually in a corner of a little pub without actual stage or pa. Anything bigger, and here would either be foh provided by the venue or then we would just be towing "the big rig" with us.

Most of the time the yamaha works as it is. But as the drummer uses either a cajon or a loota percussion mic'd, I often find myself wanting that little extra oomph even if it would be only for the kick.

And I enjoy building stuff.

And this could potentially end up as an extra bonus for me personally in the bass guitar side of things.

So in this context, I am basically asking someone smarter than me to greenlight the idea where I accept to compromise for a double purpose cab. Would a Simplexx 15 with 15FH520 add any meaningful value to a 8" yamaha stagepas system that has a crossover at 120Hz when used with a subwoofer?
Sure, it will definitely help. Based on your use - should be just fine. And as to whether it will be good for bass guitar - you'll just have to try it and see. Might not have the highs you'd like depending on your style and genre of music you play.

6 - T39 3012LF
4 - OT12 2512
1 - T24
1 - SLA Pro
2 - XF210


"A system with a few knobs set up by someone who knows what they are doing is always better than one with a lot of knobs set up by someone who doesn't."

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28619
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#6 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

He can always put in a HF horn if that's the case.

Bruce Weldy
Posts: 8301
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:37 am
Location: New Braunfels, TX

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#7 Post by Bruce Weldy »

Bill Fitzmaurice wrote: Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:58 am He can always put in a HF horn if that's the case.
ahhh.....I was assuming he meant the Simplexx 15 Sub version.....but, I guess that's not the case. Mea Culpa....

6 - T39 3012LF
4 - OT12 2512
1 - T24
1 - SLA Pro
2 - XF210


"A system with a few knobs set up by someone who knows what they are doing is always better than one with a lot of knobs set up by someone who doesn't."

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28619
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#8 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Yeah, the sub can't do double duty, the regular S15 can.

supertzar
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:15 am
Location: Finland

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#9 Post by supertzar »

Sounds great. I also figured adding the tweeter later would be simple enough to not worry about right now. The plans talk about the xmax when using the cab as a sub and I assume this is to really get those low frequencies moving. I understand that FH520 is definately better, but would the PR400 be enough for this purpose? The price difference isn't that much but the possiblity of keeping the whole build well under 200€ seems intriguing.

User avatar
Seth
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Contact:

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#10 Post by Seth »

Links to the specs would be handy
Build in process - 2 WH6, one Alpha 6a loaded, one PRV Audio 6MB250-NDY loaded

Two 2x6 shorty SLA Pro's
One T39, 16", 3012LF loaded
Tall AutoTuba, 20" wide, 2x 8" MCM 55-2421
TruckTuba, 8½" wide, 2x 8" MCM 55-2421

Grant Bunter
Posts: 6915
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:12 am
Location: Ilfracombe Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: Simplexx 15: Design overlap vs. Compromise?

#11 Post by Grant Bunter »

If there isn't much in it regarding price, go with more Xmax.

Displacement is king, especially so in subs.
Vd (Peak Volume displacement) is the parameter, and it arrived at by multiplying Xmax x Sd.
I didn't do the math, but I'm pretty sure the FH520 will win if you compare Vd.
Since you're planning building only 1 cab, give it every chance it can have. If you end up regularly hitting a limiter with the cab, it's time to build another.

Under 200 Eu, 200 Eu, just over 200 Eu, doesn't matter in the end.
I doubt you will find a new commercially priced cab at retail for anywhere near that...
Built:
DR 250: x 2 melded array, 2x CD horn, March 2012 plans.
T39's: 4 x 20" KL3010LF , 2 x 28" 3012LF.
WH8: x 6 with melded array wired series/parallel.
Bunter's Audio and Lighting "like"s would be most appreciated...

Post Reply