Page 3 of 3
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:01 pm
by Bones
I need an amp NOW, so im gonna go with the XTI
for some reason my 202 clipped very easily @ 4ohms with my 210 Jacks running (s2010)
the xti is better on this right?
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:42 pm
by mike james
Osse that would be asking alot of the 1600 ipr! IMHO hold out if you can on a ipr 3000 or 4500. When they become available in the U.S. I am going to get a 4500 for my subs and use the 3000 for tops. Will use the 1600 for monitor duty or back up. I will be bumping up for the head room. I don't like to push my amps to hard.
Mike
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:50 pm
by LEVLHED
IPR3000 is available now in USA, has power pretty close to the xti4000 and IMO sounds better on subs/bass than the xti.
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 2:41 pm
by mike james
LEVLHED wrote:IPR3000 is available now in USA, has power pretty close to the xti4000 and IMO sounds better on subs/bass than the xti.
+1 on IPR 3000 for 210 jacks...
Mike
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:02 pm
by Chris Betancourt
LEVLHED wrote:IPR3000 is available now in USA, has power pretty close to the xti4000 and IMO sounds better on subs/bass than the xti.
Thats good to hear!! Always like the design aproach to the IPR's
Have you been able to push the IPR to warvolume and how impressed are you with them???
Re: Peavey IPR vs Yamaha IPR
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:09 pm
by LEVLHED
I just did that again last night. I have no complaints. I really like them a lot.