I have not contemplated the idea. But I don't see why not. As long as the internal volume is kept the same it should be no problem.Keryn O'Shea wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2023 4:38 amHas anyone else wondered before if the OTop8 cab could be built with a trapezoidal side profile for splaying like the DRs
If one were to keep the volume exactly equal, the first idea would be to make the rear end a bit shorter. Which in turn would require the front to be a bit longer. However that would mess up just about all dimensions. Probably more trouble than it is worth.
So thinking this through, my second guess is to keep the front as designed, just make the rear end shorter. Then compensate for the smaller volume by making the cabs a tad deeper. With some math one could work out how much deeper the splayed cabs need to be to compensate for lost volume. Alternatively some 3D software would be able to help out with that.
Perhaps I am overthinking this and just making the rear a bit shorter without further compensation might work out well enough. Up to Bill to indicate the margins of internal volume wrt performance.
And one final thought: the splayed external format would make the wood working more complex than the original design. One of the major design objectives for the OT's (as I understood) was to keep them as simple as possible. Easy to build, with a minimum of tools and craftsmanship. If you go through the trouble of making your OT8s into splayed cabs, why not go for DR200s instead? Their efficiency makes them stupid loud, for both their size and required amp performance. Having owned a DR250 I can say that I have never heard a sweeter sounding PA top.