G'day gents,
I'm about to head into WH builds, with the 10 first up.
Can anyone shed light on pros & cons of the CD HF option?
Would l be right to say the WH10 (MA+2510) fitted with a pole mount, could do double duty as a top for a pair of subs? If you're just looking for background music at a gathering, lower level PA.
WH10 CD vs Peizo
-
Keryn O'Shea
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:50 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
WH10 CD vs Peizo
AT8 14", AT10 19", T30 28" LAB12, T48 36" 3015LF, THT 20" LAB15, SLA 4x3"/4x4", CArray 6x4", TLAH, TLAP, J10 FA, J12 FA, OT8 CD, OT12 FA, OT15 CD, SLAP 2x6"/4x6", WH8, DR280 MA, XF210. Next J10L
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 29074
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: WH10 CD vs Peizo
You can use it in both applications with either configuration. The difference is width of the dispersion angle.
-
Keryn O'Shea
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:50 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: WH10 CD vs Peizo
Excellent
Would the order for widest to narrowest WH HF dispersion be: Panel- Melded- CD?
Is the reason for omitting the WH10 CD horn second flare building ease, or close distance to the performer?
Could the WH8 be stretched to low level top duty also, crossing over at 110Hz?
Would the order for widest to narrowest WH HF dispersion be: Panel- Melded- CD?
Is the reason for omitting the WH10 CD horn second flare building ease, or close distance to the performer?
Could the WH8 be stretched to low level top duty also, crossing over at 110Hz?
AT8 14", AT10 19", T30 28" LAB12, T48 36" 3015LF, THT 20" LAB15, SLA 4x3"/4x4", CArray 6x4", TLAH, TLAP, J10 FA, J12 FA, OT8 CD, OT12 FA, OT15 CD, SLAP 2x6"/4x6", WH8, DR280 MA, XF210. Next J10L
- Bill Fitzmaurice
- Site Admin
- Posts: 29074
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: WH10 CD vs Peizo
Yes to all.