Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

Anything not covered elsewhere.
Post Reply
Message
Author
WB
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Ontario. Yours To Discover

Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#1 Post by WB »

Curious what a direct A/B comparison would reveal, so I've devised a plan to make a removable spacer ring and slotted baffle for one of my direct radiators (Berg EX112) and measure frequency response and power handling. I'm expecting to see a shift lower in frequency response, a possible small increase in mids, and a drop off starting at 800 Hz. due to the slot acting as an acoustic low pass filter. Slot loading is used extensively (along with horn loading) in Bill's plans, so I thought it would be interesting to isolate this one variable and measure it. Testing should be complete within a week or so. Any thoughts?

(oops, just noticed, I'll have to lop of the one corner to unblock the port :oops: )
Tomorrow I'm going to stop procrastinating - WB

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28646
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#2 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Slot loading can be modeled in WinISD Alpha Pro as a 6th order bandpass.

WB
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Ontario. Yours To Discover

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#3 Post by WB »

Thanks Bill. I just googled WinISD Alpha Pro looking for something to download. It's all for Windows, is there anything for a Mac? I'm a bit of a putz with computers, which is why I kind of prefer the empirical approach.
Tomorrow I'm going to stop procrastinating - WB

WB
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Ontario. Yours To Discover

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#4 Post by WB »

Well, found out slot loading by itself reduces the low end by a small amount, adds a 4 to 5 dB narrow bump at 500 Hz and rolls off the response steeply at 800 Hz.

Since I was set up, I also decided to make the slot half size (2"x9") for contrast and possible confirmation of the previous test, which it pretty much confirmed.

SPL Slot Loading Test, Chart


A few more pictures.
Tomorrow I'm going to stop procrastinating - WB

User avatar
Tom Smit
Posts: 7463
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Sarnia, Ont. Canada

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#5 Post by Tom Smit »

I find your testing and building very interesting. It's an added bonus to this site, as far as I'm concerned, because I/we get to learn so much more about 'sound'.
TomS

WB
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Ontario. Yours To Discover

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#6 Post by WB »

Thanks for the kind words tammojsmit. Visiting this forum has been a big learning experience for me as well.

My only disappointment is I haven't been able to use this :horse: yet.
Tomorrow I'm going to stop procrastinating - WB

dug dog
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: South Western Ontario

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#7 Post by dug dog »

tammojsmit wrote:I find your testing and building very interesting. It's an added bonus to this site, as far as I'm concerned, because I/we get to learn so much more about 'sound'.
Yeah. What he said.

User avatar
Gauss
Posts: 633
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:35 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#8 Post by Gauss »

Is that what Trace Elliot did with this amp? (BLX-80)

Image
AudioFlyer DJ: DR200 & Titan39/Titan48
BASS: Combo Amp & Titan39

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28646
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#9 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

WB wrote:Well, found out slot loading by itself reduces the low end by a small amount, adds a 4 to 5 dB narrow bump at 500 Hz and rolls off the response steeply at 800 Hz.
As with any alignment the result will vary with the size of the slot and the specs of the driver, so this one example is not going to be universally representative.

bgavin
Posts: 5740
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Sacramento, Moderator/Licensed BF Builder
Contact:

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#10 Post by bgavin »

Your steep notches look like Helmholtz resonances inside the cavity.
What is surprising is the lack of change below 100 Hz.
My understanding of mass loading is the increased effective mass drops the Fs and extends the bass response.
My biggest worry is that when I'm dead and gone, my wife will sell my toys for what I said I paid for them.

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28646
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Direct radiator vs. slot loading experiment.

#11 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

bgavin wrote: My understanding of mass loading is the increased effective mass drops the Fs and extends the bass response.
It does if the rear chamber is large enough to take advantage of it. Seeing what the slot does via an SPL measurement is only half the story. When I conducted similar experiments a decade or so ago I concentrated on the effect on Fs.

Post Reply