Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

Is this amp OK?
Post Reply
Message
Author
Ryan Sober
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#1 Post by Ryan Sober »

How does one accomplish a nominal impedance calculation, when multiple cabs are in use?

Why I ask: I have 6 TTLS in my truck, loaded with 4 Ohm drivers.

The horn "adds" about 2 Ohms of impedance... but is that added before the electrical impedance is calculated, or after?

Are my 6 cabs presenting a nominal 2.7 Ohm load? (Full parallel at 4 Ohms each, with 2 Ohms added on top)

Or are they presenting a 1 Ohm load (6 Ohms each, full parallel)?

It will really help me out on my next amplifier purchase, to know what to look for.

Thanks!

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28619
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#2 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Each cab is nominally 6 ohms. Wired parallel six cabs would be 1 ohm. I would not size an amp with the intent of using it at its minimum load rating, that's pretty much asking for trouble. Always give yourself some wiggle room.

Ryan Sober
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#3 Post by Ryan Sober »

Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:Each cab is nominally 6 ohms. Wired parallel six cabs would be 1 ohm. I would not size an amp with the intent of using it at its minimum load rating, that's pretty much asking for trouble. Always give yourself some wiggle room.
Thanks!

I plan to get a 1 Ohm stable amp that has been successfully stress-tested at a lower impedance.

Some car audio amps that are 2 Ohm stable get tested at 1 Ohm, and work fine, as long as the electrical system of the vehicle can keep up good supply.

KJ4BXT
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:37 am
Location: Northern Virginia (Fairfax) USA

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#4 Post by KJ4BXT »

For something like this I'd go with a series-parallel configuration. Lightens the load, and you should be able to get an amplifier with plenty of power to do that easily.
---------------------------
meyers at my job, BFM for my system
2x 24" T48 with 3015lf
2x DR250 with 2510 and melded array

Other hardware comes and goes, but these speakers stay.

CoronaOperator
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#5 Post by CoronaOperator »

Here are some 0.5 ohm stable arc welders, oops , i mean car amps:

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/cat_f47- ... fiers.html
Last edited by CoronaOperator on Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Built:
17" width 10" driver Autotuba
2 x 29" width dual Lab12 Tuba60
6 x DR250 2510/asd1001
In progress:
2 x DR250 2510/asd1001
For best results, point the loud end of the array towards the audience

User avatar
Tom Smit
Posts: 7457
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: Sarnia, Ont. Canada

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#6 Post by Tom Smit »

CoronaOperator wrote:Here are some 0.5 ohm stable arc welders, oops , i mean car amps:

[url]ttp://www.sonicelectronix.com/cat_f47-485_i23 ... fiers.html[/url]
missing the "haych" on the front of the link..

Corrected link.... http://www.sonicelectronix.com/cat_f47- ... fiers.html
TomS

CoronaOperator
Posts: 1648
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#7 Post by CoronaOperator »

Tom Smit wrote:missing the "haych" on the front of the link..
:oops: :oops: corrected
Built:
17" width 10" driver Autotuba
2 x 29" width dual Lab12 Tuba60
6 x DR250 2510/asd1001
In progress:
2 x DR250 2510/asd1001
For best results, point the loud end of the array towards the audience

Grant Bunter
Posts: 6915
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:12 am
Location: Ilfracombe Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#8 Post by Grant Bunter »

Hey Ryan,
Yep it's what we often do, work things out with nominal impedance.

Ages and ages back someone pointed out looking at impedance charts for the driver as well though.
The reason being that some frequencies are running well below nominal impedance, and that can be even more of a problem when paralleling cabs when it comes to amp loads.

If it turns out that by paralleling you have impedance at some frequencies below your amps specs (vs nominal impedance), you may well have to consider series/parallel...
Built:
DR 250: x 2 melded array, 2x CD horn, March 2012 plans.
T39's: 4 x 20" KL3010LF , 2 x 28" 3012LF.
WH8: x 6 with melded array wired series/parallel.
Bunter's Audio and Lighting "like"s would be most appreciated...

Ryan Sober
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#9 Post by Ryan Sober »

Grant Bunter wrote:Hey Ryan,
Yep it's what we often do, work things out with nominal impedance.

Ages and ages back someone pointed out looking at impedance charts for the driver as well though.
The reason being that some frequencies are running well below nominal impedance, and that can be even more of a problem when paralleling cabs when it comes to amp loads.

If it turns out that by paralleling you have impedance at some frequencies below your amps specs (vs nominal impedance), you may well have to consider series/parallel...
Oh, I'm well aware. That's why I make the point to say "nominal" a lot.

But it seems to me that some car audio amplifier manufacturers take that into account, and make "1 Ohm stable" amps that can handle dropping down to .3 Ohms for a single note's duration without complaining too much.

It's one of those amps I'll be getting. Something that the car audio community has verified can handle periodic dips to "unsafe" territory without letting out the magic smoke.

I'm seriously considering this amplifier: http://www.caraudiobargain.com/new-cab- ... amplifier/

My audio team president bought one, and ran it at .25 Ohms (nominal!) full-tilt for about 4 hours. It did end up dying a horrible death, but he's getting it replaced.

I really don't want to continue to run series-parallel, only because an amp rated for 1.2kw at 4 Ohms is gonna be very expensive, and the current amp I'm running is only capable of 550w at 4 Ohms... so each cab is only getting about 90w. Half of power handling. And that 3dB could be the difference between a first-place trophy, and a 4th place ribbon.

Edit: btw, thanks, everyone, for your contributions. I realize I'm kinda doing something that's off the reservation, so to speak, and I appreciate all the viewpoints you guys provide. I really like this community, and all the awesome help and ideas.

truitt
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: joplin MO

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#10 Post by truitt »

you can wire lower then the minimum impedance with car audio because of box/impedance rise. basically with car audio if you wire to 1ohm your amp will read around 2ohm, maybe even 3ohm.

Ryan Sober
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Calculating nominal impedance with multiple BFM subs.

#11 Post by Ryan Sober »

truitt wrote:you can wire lower then the minimum impedance with car audio because of box/impedance rise. basically with car audio if you wire to 1ohm your amp will read around 2ohm, maybe even 3ohm.
In this case, we are taking the "box rise" into account at the onset; that is why 6 6-Ohm cabs go down to 1-Ohm nominal. They're loaded with 4-Ohm drivers, but that extra 2-Ohms is the "box rise".

Good looking out, though. Not everyone knows about impedance rise.

Post Reply