PEAVEY IPR 1600
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
I currently have them hooked up to my floorstanders at home as I've not had a chance to play with them powering my BFM kit, for those though they're immense. In comparison to the previous amp that was powering them it sounds really clear. It might just be me imagining it but whatever, it sounds sweet to me.
4xOT12s, 2xT39s@22", TTLS@18", 2xT60@18"
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
Looks like you're not using the DSP version of IPR's; are you doing all the speaker management/processing with in SAC?BrentEvans wrote:I replaced my whole rig (and the one at church) with these. All total I have 10 of them (6 1600s and 4 3000s). Nice and quiet, good power. The 1600 will not do 60v, though. For T39 3012 or Lab, I'd get the 3000... it tops out just below 60v in my tests.
- MysticMichael
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:46 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
This sort of anticipates my noob question:Gregory East wrote:As far as I can tell you only buy these for the lightweight power, not for DSP.
For all you IPR users, is there any particular reason to buy the DSP-enabled version(s), if you are already planning to use a standalone speaker management module for your system? IOW, are there any particularly valuable features on the DSP-enabled amps that would not typically be handled - and handled effectively - by your rackmounted speaker management module?
To me, paying for DSP capability in both the power amps and the SMM would seem redundant and an unnecessary extra expense. Just curious if I'm viewing the matter accurately...
MM
"If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is: infinite."
- William Blake
- William Blake
- BrentEvans
- Posts: 3044
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:38 am
- Location: Salisbury, NC
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
+1. No need to buy the DSP versions if you already have an outboard DSP (which will likely do the job better).MysticMichael wrote: To me, paying for DSP capability in both the power amps and the SMM would seem redundant and an unnecessary extra expense. Just curious if I'm viewing the matter accurately...
If you're starting from scratch, it's worth a look... but a DriveRack, Navigator, or Protea is almost always a better buy.
99% of the time, things that aren't already being done aren't being done because they don't work. The other 1% is split evenly between fools and geniuses.
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
Especially as according to the manual some of the models have lower power with the dsp model.. don't know why
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
I've been using the 3000's for many months. They do their job very well with no complaints.
I bridge two of them @ 4ohm for two pairs of subs. I think they blow away the XTi4000's I was using on the subs before that.
I bridge two of them @ 4ohm for two pairs of subs. I think they blow away the XTi4000's I was using on the subs before that.
- Drey Chennells
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:12 pm
- Location: Central FL ~Authorized Builder
- Contact:
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
How so?LEVLHED wrote: I think they blow away the XTi4000's I was using on the subs before that.
"Things happen, but music stays in your blood forever~." bf
InfraCoustik
Consulting/Design/Fabrication
Authorized BF Builder
http://www.infracoustik.com/
info@infracoustik.com
InfraCoustik
Consulting/Design/Fabrication
Authorized BF Builder
http://www.infracoustik.com/
info@infracoustik.com
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
The quality and subjective power of the bass is way better. I heard the difference the first time I tried them out, it was totally obvious.
Last summer I let a seasoned sound guy borrow one and do a shootout with what he had. He said the IPR3000 was better on bass than his RMX2450 which I found surprising since I always thought that QSC was a go-to sub amp. He said he was surprised too. I think he picked up a couple IPR1600's after that for monitor duty.
Last summer I let a seasoned sound guy borrow one and do a shootout with what he had. He said the IPR3000 was better on bass than his RMX2450 which I found surprising since I always thought that QSC was a go-to sub amp. He said he was surprised too. I think he picked up a couple IPR1600's after that for monitor duty.
- Drey Chennells
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:12 pm
- Location: Central FL ~Authorized Builder
- Contact:
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
I'm in the amp market again and was jogging between XLS2500 and IPR3000..the RMX2450 is a good standard and for a 7lbs amp to have same or better control is something.LEVLHED wrote:The quality and subjective power of the bass is way better. I heard the difference the first time I tried them out, it was totally obvious.
Last summer I let a seasoned sound guy borrow one and do a shootout with what he had. He said the IPR3000 was better on bass than his RMX2450 which I found surprising since I always thought that QSC was a go-to sub amp. He said he was surprised too. I think he picked up a couple IPR1600's after that for monitor duty.
"Things happen, but music stays in your blood forever~." bf
InfraCoustik
Consulting/Design/Fabrication
Authorized BF Builder
http://www.infracoustik.com/
info@infracoustik.com
InfraCoustik
Consulting/Design/Fabrication
Authorized BF Builder
http://www.infracoustik.com/
info@infracoustik.com
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:35 pm
- Location: Bakersfield California
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
How are you bridging? Here are a few pics and videos of my IPR's.LEVLHED wrote:I've been using the 3000's for many months. They do their job very well with no complaints.
I bridge two of them @ 4ohm for two pairs of subs. I think they blow away the XTi4000's I was using on the subs before that.
www.djforums.com/forums/showthread.php?1414-Ipr-3000
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
What do you get for max volts on your ipr 3000 with 60hz sine before DDT?LEVLHED wrote:I've been using the 3000's for many months. They do their job very well with no complaints.
I bridge two of them @ 4ohm for two pairs of subs. I think they blow away the XTi4000's I was using on the subs before that.
I have three xti 4000 and just picked up a IPR DSP 3000. Going to do a shootout.
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
If I remember right, I get around 50V on my 1600 before the DDT. Pretty heavy duty stuff.
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
We have two of the IPR1600's driving our church PA system.http://www.lonesaguaro.com/speakers/Chu ... heWay.html
One handles the OmniTop12's; the other a single Titan 39/Delta12LF and four small 8 ohm stage monitors wired in parallel. Neither amp is running anywhere near max gain, no problems at all with power and or clipping -- they don't even get warm. Using a DriveRack for speaker management. Definitely gaudy as he11, but solid amps, clean, no hassle.
One handles the OmniTop12's; the other a single Titan 39/Delta12LF and four small 8 ohm stage monitors wired in parallel. Neither amp is running anywhere near max gain, no problems at all with power and or clipping -- they don't even get warm. Using a DriveRack for speaker management. Definitely gaudy as he11, but solid amps, clean, no hassle.
Re: PEAVEY IPR 1600
I have the Peavey IPR DSP3000 and plan to do some testing over the next week. Interestingly enough Crest is releasing it's sibling pro-lite series. Interested to find more info on the DSP limiter in this model.