Can someone check this for accuracy?

Got speaker theory questions? This is where you'll find the answers.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Tim A
Posts: 3666
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: SE Michigan, Licensed BF Builder

Can someone check this for accuracy?

#1 Post by Tim A »

I'm making/copying useful charts to carry along to gigs. Someone here recently posted an excellent Near Field/Far Field transition chart which I've copied and kept. I'm also using the boundary cancellation chart on Padrick's website. Charts are cool! It let's me look at the situation and make some quick decisions.

This is one I found and modified to include double wave lengths for cancellation between subs. It looks accurate based on numbers I've heard here, but would like some confirmation.

Image

Also a question about cancellation. If a guy were to place his subs 25' apart, which per this chart is a cancellation distance for 90Hz, would that mean everything from 90Hz and lower would be affected to some degree, and everything above 90Hz would be fine?
Last edited by Tim A on Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tim A
Posts: 3666
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: SE Michigan, Licensed BF Builder

#2 Post by Tim A »

Crap. I've tried to get it to align and it won't. It might be kind of hard to decipher. In case it is:

each line = frequency, length in feet, 2X length, 1/2 wave, 1/4 wave.

User avatar
Bill Fitzmaurice
Site Admin
Posts: 28645
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 5:59 pm

#3 Post by Bill Fitzmaurice »

Tim Ard wrote:Also a question about cancellation. If a guy were to place his subs 25' apart, which per this chart is a cancellation distance for 90Hz, would that mean everything from 90Hz and lower would be affected to some degree, and everything above 90Hz would be fine?
No. What is affected is the one frequency where the difference in the distance from each source to the listener is 1/2 wavelength, and that frequency changes as the listener moves within the coverage zone. The problem is not the distance from sub one to sub two, it's the distance from the listener to sub one minus the distance to sub two. By placing the subs at least 50 feet apart for the most part the null frequency will be raised to outside of the sub passband, and/or the listener will be hearing the output of either one or the other but not both.

User avatar
Tim A
Posts: 3666
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: SE Michigan, Licensed BF Builder

#4 Post by Tim A »

Bill Fitzmaurice wrote:
Tim Ard wrote:Also a question about cancellation. If a guy were to place his subs 25' apart, which per this chart is a cancellation distance for 90Hz, would that mean everything from 90Hz and lower would be affected to some degree, and everything above 90Hz would be fine?
No. What is affected is the one frequency where the difference in the distance from each source to the listener is 1/2 wavelength, and that frequency changes as the listener moves within the coverage zone. The problem is not the distance from sub one to sub two, it's the distance from the listener to sub one minus the distance to sub two. By placing the subs at least 50 feet apart for the most part the null frequency will be raised to outside of the sub passband, and/or the listener will be hearing the output of either one or the other but not both.
Got it, and that explains a lot. I had only part of the info, the rest of it resolves much.

I got the table fixed too, if anyone wants it, although based on Bill's explanation it's rendered almost useless.

Post Reply